If over the last couple of decades, advances in reproductive medicine have helped many couples who are

unable to conceive naturally, the initial aim was generally to favour conception using the couple's own

gametes. However, the successive developments of artificial insemination and in vitro fertilisation (IVF)

have provided us with alternative ways to conceive which no longer rely upon biological parentage. Today,

a couple can conceive a child with gametes from a third party and can even adopt an embryo conceived

by another couple. In such cases, it is necessary to reconcile the interests of all concerned (the infertile

couple, the gamete or embryo donors and the child). Certain countries have adopted laws which impose

donor anonymity which deny the child of any information on the donor, in the belief that this best assures

the child's welfare. However, such a social choice is questioned by the increasing demand by children born

through artificial insemination by donor, to remove anonymity. Such claims have been supported in certain

countries who have adopted a principle of genetic transparency.

This book is the fruit of rich debate and reflection between lawyers, doctors, psychoanalysts and sociologists

during the first Workshop of the International Academic Network on Bioethics (IANB). Through a

comparative approach, the chapters examine how the question of anonymity in sixteen different countries

is dealt with - anonymity which may be absolute, relative or even non-existent. Despite diversity

between legal systems, one thing is sure: the question of abolishing anonymity is one of immediate

importance. The answer either unites or divides. But could it be any other way on a subject which goes

to the heart of our social perceptions on individual identity, parentage and parenthood?

Created in 2007, the IANB's objective is to promote research through collaboration between academic

representatives from different countries and cultures, all specialists in the field of biomedicine. Based

upon a comparative approach of different legal systems, the work of the group analyses social choices in

biomedicine through the different lenses of ethics, anthropology, philosophy and sociology. In this way,

their research feeds into the elaboration and development of international regulation of biomedical practices

and incidentally on achieving the balance between the respect for different cultures and the move

towards a certain universality, supporting the harmonisation of laws. This new collection will therefore

be indispensable for anyone seeking to understand the social implications of bioethics.