Evidentiary privileges in international arbitration : a comparative analysis under English, American, Swiss and French law

Global markets offer a multitude of business opportunities and,
as a consequence, cross-border activities and international trade
have become the norm. This shift towards multi-jurisdictional
business transactions has resulted in an increase in international
disputes. Rules of evidence, on the other hand, including evidentiary
privileges, have been conceived for proceedings in local
courts and are not adjusted to international disputes submitted
to arbitration.
In addition, arbitration laws and arbitration rules do not provide
any guidance on how arbitral tribunals should deal with evidentiary
privileges, although rules of evidentiary privilege can vary
considerably throughout the world. For example, common law
jurisdictions, which generally provide for extensive disclosure, will
usually contain highly developed and varied evidentiary privilege
rules, while civil law jurisdictions, where disclosure is limited, will
afford less protection to evidentiary privileges.
The purpose of this book is to review the evidentiary privileges
existing under English, American, Swiss and French law that are
the most likely to be invoked in arbitration, to determine which
laws govern evidentiary privileges in international arbitration and,
finally, to determine whether there exists a preponderance of practice
suggesting that certain evidentiary privileges could develop
into transnational rules in international arbitration.